What's the Big Idea?

 

Courses tend to be detail, information, or fact rich... some more than others. By the time a student gets to the end of a typical course he or she has "learned" hundreds of new concepts, principles, theories, and factoids about that topic. Frequently, immediately after the course is finished, he or she has forgotten 90% of that material. Why does this happen?

 

Most students study most material in a non-meaningful manner. They pack it in linearly and return it to us linearly on examinations without ever having truly processed the information internally. They are acting much like faulty tape recorders (they make more errors) and they don't understand what they are repeating.

 

When the next course comes along, they record over all the "useless" stuff they had to pack in from the last course. Over the span of semesters, many ideas are covered but few are retained as meaningful knowledge by the students.

 

As a result of this process, we find that students in upper level courses do not seem to have the faintest idea of basic materials covered a semester or so before to great detail in lower level courses. Most upsetting are the "good" students who have taken those courses with us rather than with colleagues. If they had been the students of colleagues, we could have blamed their inadequacies of background on the inadequate teaching abilities of those colleagues. Because they have been our students, we are forced to search for other possibilities! :)

 

What we see as common practice among students is the reverse of what we as teachers want to happen. We want our students to incorporate what they have learned in our classes into their beings. We want them to learn ideas and information as well as the process of connecting and applying ideas in a meaningful manner. We want them to take the ideas from our courses with them for their utilitarian function and as enrichment for the students' lives. Unfortunately, this rarely happens.

What can we do about this?

We can build our courses around a framework of Big Ideas. These Big Ideas are the principles, concepts and theories that we hope students will synthesize from the mass of content examined during the run of the course. These are the things that we hope students will remember in a meaningful manner for seven years or more after the course is finished. These are the ideas we hope students will continue to use and apply in the learning of new ideas in the future. Why seven years? Currently the half-life of knowlege is seven years. The downside is I can’t tell you which half is going to be debunked.


Relation to Learning Theory

Theoretically, the Big Ideas approach follows the theories of J. Bruner (constructivism) and D. Ausubel (subsumption), both of which are schema based (Bartlett).

 

In a nutshell schema provide a mental a mental framework for understanding and remembering information. Bruner's constructivism involves learners building new ideas based upon the knowledge which they already have by making meaningful connections among ideas. Their developing connective mental models provide meaning and organization among new and old ideas. Students are encouraged to discover new principles and ideas and the curriculum is spiral in organization (frequently using learning cycles).

 

According to Ausubel's subsumption theory, new material is related to relevant ideas in the existing cognitive structure. Emphasis in instruction is placed on the use of advance organizers as a higher level of abstraction and generality than the majority of the course content. To serve as advance organizers the most general ideas should be presented first then new materials with more detail and specificity should be integrated by the students with the organizing general ideas.

 

In the Big Ideas model, Big Ideas serve the purpose of advance organizers in providing a supportive schema for the construction of meaningful knowledge within a course.

Finding the Big Ideas

How do we find the Big Ideas for a particular course? It is not as easy as it sounds. Synthesizing 12 or fewer Big Ideas (ideally 5 - 7!) is a difficult process... especially for a beginner. NOTE: If this is difficult for us as teachers, just how difficult is it for students to do all this synthesizing that we expect to happen naturally?

 

1. List major ideas which come to mind relative to the course. Don't get too picky here. Just get a brief list down and set it aside.

 

 2. Examine the text for the course:

a. Read each chapter taking detailed notes.

 

b. Summarize the notes on 1 side of 1 sheet of paper.

 

c. Summarize again to 1/2 sheet of paper.

 

d. Summarize again to 1/4 sheet of paper.

 

e. Summarize that to 1 central theme or idea.

 

 3. Add the idea from that chapter to your initial list and go on to the next chapter (you can use the Big Idea model on just a single chapter also) until the text is finished.

 

 4. Put each idea on an individual file card. Sort the cards into similar or related ideas. Synthesize the related ideas to more generalized big ideas (which results in a new set of cards).

 

 5. Once you are down to 12 or fewer cards, you have your set of Big Ideas for your course. Congratulations! You probably have also gained some new insight about your field! It is amazing what stepping back to look at the big picture does for your perspective.

 

 Now that you've found the Big Ideas, what do you do with them?

 

Course planning and preparation:

The Big Ideas form a framework for your course. In designing all aspects of the course, focus on these major principles and how the minor ideas and concepts connect to them. This keeps your eye as a learner upon the really important concepts of your course and how these concepts integrate.

 

As part of preparation of each lecture, discussion, demonstration, lab activity, field trip, paper, etc., identify any (of your) Big Ideas as a part of the structure for the learning exercise. Visualize the interconnections among these Big Ideas as foundation and the new ideas to be added during the exercise. This helps you more clearly see what must be done to construct a meaningful understanding of the material.

Learning activities:

Example learning activities with the Big Ideas include but are not limited to the following:

1. Rewrite the Big Ideas that someone else has developed in your own words then seek examples for those ideas from prior learning and experience.

2. Relate the Big Ideas of this to content of previous course work they have experience.

3. With each new chapter read, develop hierarchical concept maps of new material demonstrating linkages to the Big Ideas.

4. Apply Big Ideas to scenarios (brief sets of specific information) relating to new information or examples which you have just seen (on the news, in the paper, in a journal, etc). Link a specified number of concepts from this course to the scenario and describe the relationship to it. Then link as many of the Big Ideas as you can to the scenario, again, describing the relationships. Finally, describe links among the Big Ideas and the concepts.

5. Determine the logic of the Big Ideas

6. What are the stepping stones of the Big Ideas?

Assessment:

Assessment use of the Big Ideas include but are not limited to:

1. Draw concept map selected concepts and linkages to the Big Ideas.

2. Develop concept analysis papers in which they focus on a central idea, read related materials, then defend the central idea in an argument format using linkages to Big Ideas as evidence where possible.

3. Use new scenarios to test the students' abilities to work with them in the context of the course material and the Big Ideas.

4. The elements of thought.

5. These big ideas can become points of view so you can start asking questions like

What assumptions shape this point of view?

What information would I collect to support this point of view?

What are the implications of this point of view?

What concepts underly this point of view

What questions can I ask about this point of view? Etc.


Somebodies Big Ideas for General Biology

 

1. Biological knowledge grows through observation and experimentation within the philosophical framework which defines scientific knowing.

 

2. The processes and actions of life are products of its basis in the physical nature of matter and energy.

 

3. Life exists through the controlled transduction and exchange of energy and living order is increased as a result of the selective filtering of large quantities of energy over time (development, succession, and evolution).

 

4. Structure and function are complexly and predictably correlated forming a system. If one part of the system is changed others must change for the system to continue to function (systems theory).

 

5. Life is controlled thorugh the structural isolation of processes (within organelles, cells, systems, organisms) and the specific nature of molecular activity (enzymes).

 

6. Unifying characters such as the genetic code suggest a common ancestry for all living things.

 

7. Life demonstrates continuity by the controlled passage of information molecules (DNA) from generation to generation.

 

8. Life adjusts to short term change through negative feedback and homeostatic regulation which expend energy to maintain internal conditions within survivable limits.

 

9. Life adjusts to long term change through evolution by natural selections which results in each population having a set of tolerance limits and requirements within which it can exist and reproduce successfully (niche).

 

10. Living systems can heal minor or brief damage or injury.

 

11. Secrete it, store it, or die.